The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? |  | Author: Ian Bremmer Publisher: Portfolio Hardcover Category: Book
List Price: $26.95 Buy New: $8.39 as of 9/5/2010 03:56 CDT details You Save: $18.56 (69%)
New (49) Used (11) Collectible (1) from $8.39
Seller: abmediaservices Rating: 40 reviews Sales Rank: 28,331
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1St Edition Pages: 240 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8 Dimensions (in): 9.5 x 5.8 x 1
ISBN: 1591843014 Dewey Decimal Number: 330.122 EAN: 9781591843016 ASIN: 1591843014
Publication Date: May 13, 2010 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | ISBN13: 9781591843016 | | • | Condition: New | | • | Notes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed |
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Review
Nouriel Roubini and Ian Bremmer: Author One-to-One In this Amazon exclusive, we brought together authors Nouriel Roubini and Ian Bremmer and asked them to interview each other. Nouriel Roubini is a professor of economics at New York University's Stern School of Business. He has extensive senior policy experience in the federal government, having served from 1998 to 2000 in the White House and the U.S. Treasury. He is the founder and chairman of RGE Monitor (rgemonitor.com), an economic and financial consulting firm, regularly attends and presents his views at the World Economic Forum at Davos and other international forums, and is an adviser to cental bankers around the world. He is the author of Crisis Economics and Bailouts or Bail-Ins. Read on to see Nouriel Roubini's questions for Ian Bremmer, or turn the tables to see what Bremmer asked Roubini. Roubini: Your book [ The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations?] suggests that an old trend, what you call state capitalism, has become much more important. What happened to change things? Bremmer: Over the past 18 months, the Western financial crisis and the global recession have accelerated the inevitable transition from a G7 to a G20 world. That’s not just a matter of more states at the bargaining table. It’s not just about having to herd more cats to get things done on the international stage. It’s about herding cats together with other animals that don’t really like cats. And that’s not really herding. The G7 world was one where everyone that mattered for growth in the global economy accepted the assumption that prosperity depended on rule of law, independent courts, transparency and a free media—and in the value of free market capitalism. In that world, multinational corporations are the principle economic heavyweights. This consensus has provided the engine driving globalization for the past 40 years. The sun has set on that world. The country that has emerged strongest and fastest from the global slowdown is one that does not accept the idea that a regulated free market economy is crucial for sustainable economic growth. China’s success has persuaded authoritarians around the world that they really can have explosive growth without undermining their monopoly hold on domestic political power. China has enjoyed double-digit growth for thirty years without freedom of speech, without well-established economic rules of the road, without judges that can ignore political pressure, without credible property rights—without democracy. And the events of the past 18 months have made China more important that ever for the future of global economic growth. This is a big change with enormous implications that we had better start thinking through. Roubini: The term state capitalism means different things to different people. How do you explain it today? Bremmer: I’m writing about a system in which the state uses the power of markets primarily for political gain. A country’s political leaders know that command economies will eventually fail, but they’re afraid that if they allow space for markets that are truly free, they’ll lose control of how wealth is generated. They could end up empowering others who will use markets to generate revenue that can then be used to challenge the government’s authority to dominate the country’s political life. So they use national oil companies, other state-owned enterprises, privately owned but politically loyal national champion companies, and sovereign wealth funds to exercise as much control as possible over the creation of wealth within the country’s borders. And they send these companies and investment fund abroad to secure deals that increase the state’s political and geopolitical leverage in a variety of ways. This system is fundamentally incompatible with a free market system. Roubini: Creating friction between the state capitalists and other governments. To say nothing of privately owned companies. Bremmer: Exactly, yes. In a free market system, multinational corporations are looking to maximize profits. In markets that are not intelligently regulated, and we’ve seen this in the United States, they're looking to maximize short-term gains at the expense of sustainable, long-term growth for their shareholders or for their own compensation. The past two years have reminded us of the sometime excesses of free market capitalism. In a state capitalist system-- the principle economic actors are looking first to achieve political goals. Profits are subordinate to that goal. In other words, if profits serve the state’s interests, they’ll pursue profits. But if the state needs a state-owned oil company to pay through the nose to lock up long-term supplies to the oil, gas, metals and minerals needed to secure the long-term growth that keeps workers in their jobs, off the streets, and the political leaders in power, profits and efficiency can become political liabilities and these companies will pay whatever it takes to get what their political patrons want. But the state-owned companies are competing with multinationals that won’t overpay, that can’t overpay. Here, the injection of politics into market activity distorts the outcome—in this case by raising the price that we all pay for energy and other commodities. Roubini: When you mention the state capitalist countries, which ones do you specifically have in mind? Bremmer: We find state capitalist powers among the Arab monarchies of the Persian Gulf-- Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are the most important. You see this trend, of course, in Putin’s Russia. There are other examples of countries that mix free market with state capitalist policies. But we wouldn’t be talking about state capitalism as game-changer for international politics and the global economy if it weren’t for China, now the world’s second largest economy and its fastest growing major marketplace. Roubini: The End of the Free Market is a provocative title. Are you trying to out-Doom me? Bremmer: You know I wouldn’t do that. But you have to admit, it’s not an exaggeration. It’s not that I think the United States is going to throw away its free market principles. It's not about President Obama being some kind of socialist. Washington will tighten the regulation of financial markets in coming months, and some people won’t like that. Americans will not lose their faith in the power of free market capitalism to generate prosperity. But that can’t be said for the rest of the world. The global economic system is no longer driven by consensus around these values. There are now competing forms of capitalism. You used the word friction. That’s exactly the right word. Friction, competition, even conflict. There will be winners and losers, and the world’s political and business leaders better begin to try to sort out who those winners and losers will be. Roubini: Do you mean that state capitalists will be winners and those who bank on free markets will lose? Bremmer: Not necessarily. We’re going to see governments around the world that no longer feel bound to follow the Western rulebook of decades past. We’ll see multinational corporations struggling to adapt, because foreign investment will become much less predictable and much more complicated. And the backing they get from their home governments won’t carry as much weight. Yet, some of them will be more successful than others at learning to compete on a playing field that isn’t level. There are very good reasons to doubt that the state capitalists will have staying power. But for now, they have lots of new clout and plenty of advantages. Over the next five, ten, twenty years, state capitalist governments and the companies and institutions they empower will be a serious—and global--force to be reckoned with. The threat for Americans is that all this is happening at a moment when people are struggling, and their elected leaders have every incentive to respond to that fear and anger with promises to throw up walls meant to protect them from all these changes. Americans have always prided themselves on tearing down walls, not building them. State capitalism and American populism will put that faith to the test. Roubini: Were you tempted to call your book The End of Globalization? Bremmer: No, this isn’t the end of globalization. It is the end of globalization’s singular, overriding power to shape our lives and the future of the global economy. Globalization depends on access to global consumer markets, capital markets, and labor markets. State capitalism compromises all three. Globalization still matters, and it will continue to matter for the foreseeable future. But it is no longer the fundamental driver of growth in a global economy that looks increasingly toward China for the next expansion. (Photo of Nouriel Roubini © RGE Monitor) Product Description Understanding the rise of state capitalism and its threat to global free markets
The End of the Free Market details the growing phenomenon of state capitalism, a system in which governments drive local economies through ownership of market-dominant companies and large pools of excess capital, using them for political gain. This trend threatens America's competitive edge and the conduct of free markets everywhere.
An expert on the intersection of economics and politics, Ian Bremmer has followed the rise of state-owned firms in China, Russia, the Arab states of the Persian Gulf, Iran, Venezuela, and elsewhere. He demonstrates the growing challenge that state capitalism will pose for the entire global economy.
Among the questions addressed: Are we on the brink of a new kind of Cold War, one that pits competing economic systems in a battle for dominance? Can free market countries compete with state capitalist powerhouses over relations with countries that have elements of both systems-like India, Brazil, and Mexico? Does state capitalism have staying power?
This guide to the next big global economic trend includes useful insights for investors, business leaders, policymakers, and anyone who wants to understand important emerging changes in international politics and the global economy. |
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 40
Compact, balanced and informative: a first-rate briefing book May 1, 2010 Peter G. Keen (virginia usa) 31 out of 32 found this review helpful
This is an excellent briefing book. It doesn't drive a single idea, offer a polemic position or try to be controversial. It is thus a hype-free reliable guide to a complex subject. The sequence of logic is centrist and carefully couched. It shows how state capitalism, rather than socialism, is the growing counter to liberal capitalism, in Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and many smaller economies. This is not driven by ideology and Bremmer convincingly argues against any coming Armageddon or WWF wrestling contest of King Kong Commies take on Freedom Fighting Finance Whizzes. He shows that the drivers of state capitalism are very much centered on political control of resources and power and of job creation. It adopts a very domestic focus and is as short-term in its focus as the earnings-driven Wall Street community. He points not so much to the distortions of markets and the misallocation of national resource this leads to as the absence of countervailing forces that are intrinsic to liberal democracies. He emphasizes the commonality of axiomatic belief in market forces that underlies countries like Norway, France and Germany that are too often classified as anti-markets. Under all the rhetoric is an often tense balancing of economics and business versus the intersection of politics and social priorities. Bremmer is pretty convincing in showing that state capitalism does not overall provide the better blueprint for growth but also that it will continue to grow because of its political rather than economic focus.
My test in rating the book was to consider three questions:
1. Would I recommend it to someone largely unfamiliar with the issues to get a sound grounding. A definite 'yes' here. I know the fields fairly well and I felt that the coverage was simple without being simplistic, lucid, fair in judgment and broad enough to provide a sound briefing. It's very much is the style of Atlantic magazine pieces, the Economist and Foreign Affairs journal. It's well-presented, though not exciting or jazzy. It emphasizes judgment over flashiness.
2. Would I recommend it to an expert? Here, the answer is more or a 'probably' than 'yes.' There's little that's new or striking in analysis or the sensible centrist recommendations for policy at the end of the book. The "probably" is because it brings material together in a shrewd exegesis, so that I found conformation of what I already know, and extra insights too. His analysis of the dominance of state capitalism in the oil sector was a grabber, for instance. I hadn't realized that ExxonMobil is just 15th in revenues, behind state-owned firms and that the eight top multinationals account for just 10% of global revenues and 3% of reserves. It's not overheavy on such statistics but usefully selective in the ones it does present.
3. Is it useful for a wide range of readers? The specialist economics and policy literature circles round and round all the topics Bremmer covers and provides far more depth. But World Bank type policy wonkery is for a narrow audience. I think this book is useful for business managers; it helps make sense of China and provides a sound overview of global trade. It is useful, too, for those interested in the political issues. It's distinctly centrist and won't anger or evangelize the extreme left or right. For any general reader, it sensibly counters all the guff about the death of capitalism as we know it.
All in all, this is a very professional and well-presented guidebook. Two aphorisms come to mind. One is "This leaves me none the wiser." "Yes, but infinitely better informed." The other is "You are entitled to your own opinions but not to your own facts." This book will help you be better informed and surer of your facts. What more could one ask in trying to be a little wiser?
The coming battle between Free Markets and Capitalism v. 2.0 May 13, 2010 Todd Bartholomew (Atlanta, GA USA) 9 out of 10 found this review helpful
The recent tumult in financial markets has politicians, business executives, economists, and scholars alike reconsidering the future of the free market system, and it's an appropriate time for a well reasoned book such as this one from political scientist Ian Bremmer. Bremmer first came to notice with his thought provoking The J Curve: A New Way to Understand Why Nations Rise and Fall (2006) and The Fat Tail: The Power of Political Knowledge in an Uncertain World (with a New Preface) (2009). As the markets have been roiled by a series of problems there have not only been calls to re-regulate them but to fundamentally rethink free market capitalism in general. The rise of so many sovereign wealth funds from wealthier oil-rich nations and autocratic state-run economies such as China has caused many to question and rethink the existing global political economic structure. In an age where the G-20 makes more sense than the old G-7 it fairly begs for a general rethink. The diffusion and dispersal of economic power is changing the global dynamic not just for political leaders but for corporations in general. Old concepts of open markets, the rule of law, an independent judiciary, fiscal transparency, and a free press are increasingly starting to look quaint in a decentralized post-American World, to borrow a phrase from Fareed Zakariah. These changes are more than a mere swing of the pendulum from de-regulated markets back to regulated markets, but a fundamental rethinking of markets entirely. The emergence of State Capitalism is creating a new friction between existing free market capitalist societies and the newer tightly regulated and controlled economic powers. In a very real sense we're seeing the old model of capitalism being passed over in favor of a Capitalism Version 2.0 if you will.
Reading "The End of the Free Market" often reminded me of Deng Xiaoping's old comment about "I don't care if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice." State capitalists don't care for the niceties of democracy so long as they net economic results. And in an era where the U.S. government has become the majority shareholder in a number of public corporations the question becomes whether we're far off from that same model should these companies fail to free themselves from being wards of the state. To a degree I felt echoes of "The Commanding Heights" where those counties advocating State Capitalism aren't really all removed from those states who promoted state champions, corporations essentially backed by the state to compete against foreign competition. In the end those state champions largely failed for a multitude of reasons, yet that happened in democratic societies, not the new wave of autocratic State Capitalism. And Bremmer isn't entirely certain that free market capitalism will win out over these new State Capitalist systems. These two competing systems could present a new bi-polar world just as happened with politics in the Cold War era.
As one of the foremost thinkers on global political risk Bremmer manages to write in an approachable way that is easy for the lay person to comprehend, yet which also doesn't' insult reader's intelligence. "The End of the Free Market" is certainly yet another thought provoking read from Bremmer and hopefully one that will spur new discussions about the world's global economic future.
The End of the Free Market as We Know It May 14, 2010 Devin Stewart (New York, NY USA) 8 out of 9 found this review helpful
My review reprinted from Huffington Post:
Political risk guru Ian Bremmer examines the growing momentum of "state capitalism" in his new book The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War between States and Corporations? Bremmer argues that state capitalism differs from free-market capitalism in that politics rather than profit is the main driver of decision-making. For this reason, it threatens to curtail free markets and the global economy. It is the latest chapter in the "rise of the rest," or the expansion of non-Western states in the international system.
Capitalism takes many forms but all of them can be distinguished by their "use of wealth to create more wealth, a broad enough definition to capture both free-market and state capitalism," Bremmer notes. In the free-market form of capitalism, the job of the state is to "enable" wealth generation by enforcing contracts and limiting the influence of moral bads such as greed--the latter can lead to market failures, which have occurred periodically since the Dutch tulip craze of 1637. Free-market governments attempt to ensure that the economic game is played fairly.
In contrast to free-market capitalism, the economy in state-capitalist regimes is dominated by the state agenda. "Forced to choose between the protection of the rights of the individual, economic productivity, and the principle of consumer choice, on the one hand, and the achievement of political goals, on the other, state capitalists will choose the latter every time," Bremmer explains. Continuing the sports game analogy, state capitalists control the referees as well as the main players.
Bremmer admits that state capitalism isn't new. He traces the first reference to an 1896 speech by Wilhelm Liebknecht, a founder of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. But due to recent questions regarding the merits of free markets after the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the need for job growth and economic stability in less-than-democratic regimes, and the growth of the economies and influence of state-capitalist countries, this form of capitalism is catching on worldwide.
While there is "no single model of state capitalism," its leading practitioners, China and Russia, "share a well-developed sense of risk aversion," having recently abandoned communism as their guiding philosophies. Other notable users of this model include energy-rich states, such as Angola, Iran, Kuwait, Malaysia, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela. Another cluster of countries in this group, some of which have benefited from rising commodity prices, include emerging markets that have only tentatively committed to free-market principles, such as Brazil, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey.
Another way to identify a state-capitalist country is by looking at the use of four specific policy tools. One policy tool favored by state capitalists is the national oil (and gas) corporation (NOC), such as Gazprom of Russia, China National Petroleum Corporation, and the National Iranian Oil Company. NOCs like these own 75 percent of the world's crude-oil reserves. A second tool is the state-owned enterprise, such as China's First Automobile Works.
A third tool is privately-owned companies--so-called national champions--that are supported by the state to develop a "commanding position" in an economy. The Brazilian mining concern Vale, according to Bremmer, is a prominent example of a company that was coerced by its government to advance the state objective of stimulating the economy.
A final tool is the sovereign wealth fund (SWF), the largest of which includes the UAE's Abu Dhabi Investment Authority valued at $300-650 billion and Saudi Arabia's Monetary Agency valued at $430-500 billion. Many types of governments have SWFs but they "tend to be as transparent--or as secretive--as their governments," Bremmer writes, noting that Norway's Government Pension Fund is exceedingly open and accountable. Norway is an example of a country that has some state-capitalist trappings but is not in the state-capitalist camp. Similarly, the U.S. bailout of financial institutions was designed to "save the free market, not bury it," Bremmer notes. "It's not the tools that count; it's how they're used. But countries that have all four of these institutions tend to be state capitalist," he writes.
How do these tools threaten the free market? While Bremmer is careful not to predict a new Cold War, he does worry about fissures in the international system and state-capitalist support for undemocratic regimes such as Guinea. As the head of Eurasia Group, a political risk company, it is Bremmer's job to ask what if. He poses at least ten hypothetical scenarios in the book, including given the mutually assured economic destruction (or interdependence) between the United States and China, what happens if China closes the door?
While the phrase "The End of the Free Market" may capture public anxiety in America today, Bremmer should have called his book "The End of State Capitalism"--he bets that free markets will win the "war" with statists. First, state capitalism just doesn't have the same appeal as an ideology that communism had, it is "more a set of governing principles than a coherent political ideology." Second, state capitalism is actually a sign of domestic political vulnerability. It is a response to the risks countries face as they open up, which Bremmer detailed in his earlier book The J Curve. Meanwhile, free markets hold several advantages over their statist cousins: Most importantly, these systems better facilitate innovation and long-term growth.
Bremmer lays out several recommendations to ensure that free markets do indeed prevail. Most of these recommendations are just good common sense for America: keep markets open, invest in hard power, pick the right fights, and welcome world-class foreign workers. Bremmer is saying subtly that for America to continue to lead it should be strong, smart, and principled. In other words, it should stay true to its values.
A Refreshing Perspective on the International Political Economy May 14, 2010 Yoni Ish-Hurwitz 4 out of 5 found this review helpful
This provocative title reiterates a statement made by China's Vice Foreign Minister, He Yafei, to a group of economists and scholars at the Chinese Consulate in New York: "Now that the free market has failed, what do you think is the proper role for the state in the economy?" Throughout the book, Bremmer explains the great divide between free market capitalism and state capitalism, providing a unique perspective in our understanding of our international political economy.
Prime examples of state capitalism are China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia. These states have a strong hold over the economy, allowing them to almost control growth. However, growth and prosperity is not an objective of these states, says Bremmer, but a means for regime preservation. The leadership's security comes before the economic sense and the people's wellbeing. Leadership can take steps such as keeping obsolete industries alive just to maintain jobs (Russia), forgiving debt on the eve of elections (India), and driving Google out over censorship (China, of course).
What does the gap between the two systems, or approaches, mean for the international environment? For one, it is harder to reach an agreement on key issues, such as climate change, financial regulation, relations with Iran, and the dollar's role as an international reserve currency, says Bremmer. The leading global decision-making group is G20, that now includes the powerful state capitalists, which simply speak in different terms than the "traditional" free market capitalists of the good old G7. The new conflict of ideologies may not be a new Cold War, but it presents what Bremmer terms "mutually assured economic destruction." That is, China and the U.S. are bound by very strong ties - the U.S. needs China to finance its debt, and China needs American consumers to continue buying Chinese exports.
Finally, what is it that lies at the base of the Chinese Vice Foreign Minister's argument? Free markets are more prone to produce bubbles, compared to strictly controlled economies. Furthermore, when those bubbles bust, free market capitalists tend to take more control over the market, providing bail outs such as the TARP. But these are temporary measures. Eventually these governments prefer to surrender control to promote more growth and, well, freedom.
Proper analysis of the global socio-economic political condition May 26, 2010 P. Sullivan (Tampa, FL) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
The author makes sense of much of the post Communist/ Cold War era policies of various countries and multinational corporations in the new global economy. New players and referees are identified and qualified with thorough background and policy facts that the intermediate disciple of world politics would easily grasp. Cutting edge interdependent analysis is spot on and sure to drive a new realm of perspective and information on how we generally view the global network at the intersection of politics and economics. The book identifies the muddling of world governments in capitalist and global systems by encroaching POLITICAL means as it's intended driver. The author also puts American politics into the larger global context of the ideology spectrum and offers a partial prescription, (by way of, non secrecy, consistency, and stewardship in socio-economic philosophical terms) that both major American political parties (i.e., government officials) should heavily consider when representing the American People. Simply said: well done sir. Thank you for refining the American conversation once again and offering keen world business perspective that all global readers can come to terms with for the years ahead.
Excellent read (although maybe not for the light reader-- very dense material at times).
Showing reviews 1-5 of 40
|
|
|